LUCKY BRAND DUNGAREES v MARCEL FASHIONS (Issue/claim preclusion)

This issue is not similar enough to qualify for defensive issue or claim preclusion.

US v SINENENG-SMITH (Party Presentation rule)

9th Circuit can not make this case about something that the parties had not already presented.

KELLY v. UNITED STATES (Bridgegate)

Regarding the wore fraud charges not being appropriate. 

NY STATE RIFLE & PISTOL v. CITY OF NEW YORK

Vacated and remanded for further proceedings. Mostly Moot/can’t assert a new clam here.

MAINE COMMUNITY HEALTH OPTIONS v. UNITED STATES (Risk Corridors)

The government obligated itself to pay in this instance. (Health insurance risk corridors)

Georgia v Public.Resource.org

The annotations are not copyrightable.

BARTON v BARR (Stop Time cancellation of removal)

ROMAG FASTENERS v. FOSSIL GROUP (Willfulness in infringment)

Willfullness not specifically required under §1125(a).

MAUI, HAWAII v. HAWAII WILDLIFE FUND (Point Source)

The point source case.

THRYV, INC. v. CLICK-TO- CALL (§314, Inter Partes review)

Reviewability of decision to do an inter partes review.

ATLANTIC RICHFIELD v. CHRISTIAN (Superfund)

Dispute over a superfund site in Montana.

Ramos v Louisiana (Right to unanimous jury)

The 6th amendment (through the 14th)  requires unanimous jury to convict on serious crimes.

Democratic NC v Republican NC

PC Opinion on an Injunction relating to the election in Wisconsin.

Babb v Wilkie (Age Discrimination)

ADEA

Kansas v Glover (probable cause)

Without additional information to rebut the presumption, it is reasonable for an officer to believe a vehicle belonging to a driver with a revoked license is being driven by the owner.

CITGO v Frescati

Safe berth clause of sub charter agreement In this case means safe berth, not due diligence.

Davis v US (appeal of plain error)

Telling the 5th circuit to review for plain error.

Comcast v Natl Assn. African American media

Court says §1981 still needs but-for causation.

Kahler v Kansas (Insanity Defense)

the court refuses to set a constitutional bar for the insanity defense.

Allen v Cooper (copyright/state sov immunity)

Court holds CRCA does not properly abrogate state sovereign immunity against copyright infringement.

Guerrero-Lasprilla v Bar (Immigration)

In this case the question is a “question of law”

Kansas v Garcia

The fact info is used on the I-9 form, does not preempt that information (submitted on other forms) from being used to prosecute for fraud.

Intel v Sulyma

ERISA - Defining “Actual Knowledge” as being Actual Knowledge.

Holguin-Hernandez v US

petitioner did enough to preserve right of appeal. 

Shular v US

ACCA arguments, including things depending on what the definition of “is” is.