Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)
We Read The Supreme Court's own Syllabus or Per Curium word for word, then maybe say hin then shut the microphone back off.
We are the Antidote to Mainstream News and Entertainment-Hype Style coverage of the Supreme Court...What they do in the words of the RJD (Recorder of Judicial Decisions) Read by RJ Dieken and friends
Visit Montana's famous Loki Esq Law @ LokiEsq.Law (website) A Criminal Defense and Mediation Lawfirm Operating Statewide.
Be Kind to one another, say hi someday.
RoadsScholar80@gmai
*Note this podcast is for informational and educational purposes only.
Episodes
583 episodes
Gundy v US (delegation of power)
The sex offender registry’s registration of pre act offenders in not an issue of unconstitutional congressional delegation.
McDonagh v Smith (fabricated evidence)
When does the limitations period clock start ticking in re a claim of fabricated evidence.
Am Legion v Am Humanist Assoc. (establishment clause)
The Bladensburg cross may remain.
PDR v Carlton & Harris (unsolicited advertisement)
Remand for consideration of a few things.
Manhattan CAC v Halleck (1a)
The Manhattan community access corp, is not a government actor in regards to the 1st amendment right to free speech.
VA Uranium v Warren (NRC/AEA)
A Virginia ban on Uranium mining is upheld.
Gamble v US (sep sovereigns doctrine)
The separate sovereigns doctrine is not implicated by double jeopardy.
Quarles v US (Burglaries & the ACA)
Quarles’ burglary conviction counts under the Armed Career Criminal act.
Return Mail v US Postal Service (Patent and who is a person)
In this context, Agents of the sovereign (federal agencies) are not “persons” in this section of the AIA.
Parker Drilling v Newton
CA Law needs to fill a gap in federal law to be applicable on the outer continental shelf, under the OCSLA, it can not simply be “not inconsistent”.
Azar v Allina health (Medicare “fraction”)
In re notice and comment when changing substanitive rules.
Taggart v Lorenzen (Bankruptcies and Civil Contempt)
Vacate and remand, contempt findings in this context require “no fair ground of doubt”.
Mont v US (supervised release tolling)
Prisoner does not get credit for his pre trial custody in re his supervised release for another crime.
Home depot v Jackson (who can remove to federal court)
Third party counterclaim defendants can not remove to federal court.
Box v Planned Parenthood (Fetal Disposition law)
Explicitly stated not to be case about the right to an abortion, although i’m sure the news media will tell you so.Still have a bit of a sore throat, so apologies on some audible swallowing noises etc.
Nieves v Bartlett (Retaliatory arrest)
Retaliatory arrest claim defeated by probable cause to arrest.
Merck & Dohme v Albrecht (Duty to warn/impossibly doctrine)
A clarification on what is considered clear evidence that a drug company could not fulfill it’s duty to warn in light of FDA refusals to allow label changes.
Herrera v WY (Treaty hunting rights)
Bighorn national forest is not “occupied lands” in the context of an 1865 treaty. Said treaty did not expire upon Wyoming's statehood.
Mission v Tempnology (contracts in bankruptcy)
Breach of a contract under the bankruptcy code still constitutes breach of a contract in this instance.