Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)
We Read The Supreme Court's own Syllabus or Per Curium word for word, then maybe say hin then shut the microphone back off.
We are the Antidote to Mainstream News and Entertainment-Hype Style coverage of the Supreme Court...What they do in the words of the RJD (Recorder of Judicial Decisions) Read by RJ Dieken and friends
Visit Montana's famous Loki Esq Law @ LokiEsq.Law (website) A Criminal Defense and Mediation Lawfirm Operating Statewide.
Be Kind to one another, say hi someday.
RoadsScholar80@gmai
*Note this podcast is for informational and educational purposes only.
Episodes
583 episodes
New Jersey v NCAA (10th Amendment)
Court strikes down federal anti sports gambling provisions based on the 10th amendment.
McCoy v Louisiana (6th Amendment)
Counsel may not Plead Not-Guilty, at the client's insistence, and then--at trial--admit guilt, over the objection of his client. (Sixth Amendment)
Oil States v Greene’s (Patent law) (stitcher re-release)
Patent review, and article 3 separation of powers.
Jesner v Arab Bank (Alien Torts) (Stitcher re-release)
Court holds that the ATS does not allow people to sue corporations.
SAS v Patent office (inter partes wholeness)
Court rules patent office director can not choose which parts of an inter partes review will proceed, only that it will or will not proceed.
US v Microsoft (Moot)
The discussion is moot. Because of the passage of the CLOUD act.
Sessions v Dimaya (void for vagueness)
Court compares immigration deportation statue void for vagueness. In that it’s language was too similar to the unconstitutional language found in the ACCA.
Willson v Sellers (Looking through silent decisions)
Court rules that higher courts may should “look through” (in a narrow sense) silent appeals court decisions, to the last reasoned result.
Encino motorcars v Navarro (FLSA Overtime)
Determination that service advisors fit into the FLSAs overtime exemption.
Kisela v Hughes (Qualified immunity)
Determination of qualified immunity in favor of an officer in a non fatal shooting.
Hall v Hall (Separating consolidated cases for appeal)
Court Decides once a decision has been made in an individual case which was consolidated with others under 42(a), it can be appealed before other cases associated by consolidation have been decided. (Not interlocutory).
Ayestas v Davis (Appeals funding)
in re funding for appeals of indigent defendants, ineffective assistance of counsel, reasonably necessary vs substantial need.
Marinello v USA (Obstuction Tax code)
court holds that in order to obstruct the tax code under the omnibus tax code at the felony level — it requires knowing of an investigation or pending investigation.
Cyan v Beaver Co retirement fund (Securities Jurisdictions)
Court holds SLUSA does not force removal of certain securities law claims from state to federal court.
TX v NM (water rights)
can the us file suit regarding the rio grande compact?
US Bank v Lakeridge LLC (appeals of “arms length” determination)
case deals with who and how courts should review determinations of “arms length” transactions.
Merit v FTI (Bankrupcy)
in re: transfer avoidance in bankruptcy proceedings.
Patchak v Zinke (Sep of powers)
in re: Article III separation of powers.
Jennings v Rodriguez (immigration)
in re: supreme court rule to remove 6 month hearings for detainees of immigration proceedings, that were being required by the 9th circut.
Murphy v Smith
courts must use the stipulated 25% maximum to satisfy a prisoner’s share of attorney fees (the one where everyone had a joke about the usage of “satisfy”)
Class v United States (Appeal Process -- Not 2A)
a guilty plea does not remove a defendants right to question the constitutionality of a criminal statute.
Digital Realty trust v Somers
In Re: whistle blower protections and the requirement to report to the SEC.
