Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)
Following what the Supreme Court is actually doing can be daunting. Reporting on the subject is often only done within the context of political narratives of the day -- and following the Court's decisions and reading every new case can be a non-starter. The purpose of this Podcast is to make it as easy as possible for members of the public to source information about what is happening at the Supreme Court. For that reason, we read every Opinion Syllabus without any commentary whatsoever. Further, there are no advertisements or sponsors. We call it "information sourcing," and we hope that the podcast is a useful resource for members of the public who want to understand the legal issues of the day, prospective law students who want to get to know legal language and understand good legal writing, and attorneys who can use the podcast to be better advocates for their clients.
*Note this podcast is for informational and educational purposes only.
Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)
Latest Episodes
MONTGOMERY v. CARIBE TRANSPORT II, LLC
A claim that one company negligently hired another to transport goods is not preempted by the FAAAA because States retain authority
JULES v. ANDRE BALAZS PROPERTIES (ARBITRATION, CIVIL PROCEDURE, FEDERAL COURT JURISDICTION)
A federal court that has previously stayed claims in a pending ac tion under §3 of the FAA has jurisdiction to confirm or vacate a result ing arbitral award on those claims as prescribed in §9 and §10 of the FAA; nothing in the FAA preclu...
FIRST CHOICE WOMEN’S RESOURCE CENTERS v. DAVENPORT, A.G. OF NEW JERSEY (1A and donor records)
First Choice has established a present injury to its First Amend ment associational rights sufficient to confer Article III standing.
Louisiana v. Callais (§2 of the Voting Rights Act)
In Louisiana v. Callais, the Supreme Court held that Louisiana’s congressional map (SB8), which created an additional majority-Black district, was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander because race predominated in its design without a s...
ENBRIDGE ENERGY, LP v. NESSEL
Because §1446(b)(1)’s text, structure, and context are inconsistent with equitable tolling, Enbridge’s removal was untimely. Pp. 5–14. (a) The fact that the 30-day removal deadline in §1446(b)(1) is non jurisdictional does not automatical...
